By Raimo Siltala
Analytical jurisprudence has been regularly silent at the function of precedent in criminal adjudication. what's the content material of a judge's precedent ideology, or the rule of thumb of precedent-recognition, via which the ratio of a case is to be amazing from mere dicta? during this examine, the writer identifies six forms of judicial precedent-ideology, and assessments them opposed to judicial reports within the united kingdom, US, France, Italy, Germany and Finland. the writer indicates a redefinition of Lon Fuller's inner morality of legislation, and confronts primary questions on the normative nature of legislation. Is Kelsen's grundnorm or Hart's final rule of popularity legitimate, or basically observable simply within the practices and behaviour of judges and different officers? the writer claims that Hart is stuck among Kelsen and J.L. Borges in as far as the starting place of the rule of thumb is anxious. the writer concludes that the specter of unending self-referentiality can in simple terms be accounted for by way of recourse to Jacques Derrida's philosophy of deconstruction.
Read or Download A Theory of Precedent: From Analytical Positivism to a Post-Analytical Philosophy of Law PDF
Best legal theory & systems books
The authors are happy to provide the once a year replace of the 3rd version of Volumes I and II of "Principles of Federal Appropriations Law". Their aim during this e-book is to give a cumulative complement to the printed 3rd variation textual content that comes with all correct judgements from 1 January to 31 December 2007.
In Pardons, Kathleen Dean Moore addresses a number of an important questions surrounding acts of clemency, together with what justifies pardoning strength, who will be pardoned, and the definition of an unforgivable crime. Illustrating her arguments with wealthy and engaging historic examples--some scandalous or humorous, others inspiring or tragic--Moore examines the philosophy of pardons from King James II's perform of marketing pardons for 2 shillings, in the course of the debates of the Founding Fathers over pardoning strength, to the checklist low variety of pardons in the course of contemporary U.
Offering examples of ways literary money owed promises a complement to our knowing of technology in legislations, this ebook demanding situations the view that legislations and technology are different. It specializes in tales which discover the connection among legislation and technological know-how, particularly cultural pictures of technology that succeed in felony contexts.
This ground-breaking booklet demanding situations readers to reconsider the divide among liberal and orthodox techniques which characterises Christianity at the present time. offers a substitute for the liberal / orthodox divide in modern Christianity. Defends Christianity’s engagement with non-Christian traditions. contains very important dialogue of theological procedure.
Extra resources for A Theory of Precedent: From Analytical Positivism to a Post-Analytical Philosophy of Law
I will unfold the contents of a judge’s intellectual toolbox vis-à-vis precedent-identification and precedent-following at the level of legal ideology, in order to give an adequate account of the methods of distinguishing the binding element (ratio decidendi) of a case from its argumentative context (obiter dicta), and of the ideological consequences to be drawn therefrom. In light of the comparative material collected and analysed by the Bielefelder Kreis, such precedent ideologies would seem to find a reasonably adequate match with the “law in action” of precedent-following, as will be argued in detail in chapter 5, below.
First, the theoretical and methodological frame of analysis will be presented concisely (chapter 1). The concept of a legal norm will be outlined in light of the recent, Dworkin-inspired legal rule/principle discourse, leading to a novel definition of the concept of a legal rule and legal principle, which will then be adjusted to the specific context of precedent-following (chapter 2). A novel theory of a judge’s precedent ideology will be set out in terms of the six main categories or “pure types”, and the relative merits and shortcomings of each of the key approaches to precedents will be considered briefly (chapter 3).
Ich bin dann geneigt, zu sagen: ‘So handle ich eben’ ”. Frame of Analysis 33 In the present treatise, Derrida is read as a radically non-conventional philosopher who puts forth the decisively post-metaphysical or, rather, premetaphysical question of the meta of Western metaphysics since Plato and Aristotle, obstinately “running up against the limits of language” and ignoring the bumps that might then emerge in the forehead of reason,120 in an openly selfdefeating effort of “saying the unsayable” or trying to account for the fugitive conditions of possibility and impossibility of Western philosophy itself.